Skip to content

A Study on Building a Sustainable Transportation System through the Introduction of Bicycle–Public Transport Transfer Stations

SungJin Park Primary Contact
Abstract

Bicycles play a vital role in sustainable urban mobility, yet they remain largely disconnected from public transport in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, limiting their potential to reduce carbon emissions, enhance mobility efficiency, and promote healthier lifestyles. (1) Background/Purpose: According to the Korea Transport Institute (2023), approximately 13.4 million South Koreans ride bicycles, with 3.3 million using them daily. Despite Seoul’s public bike-sharing service Ddareungi recording a 298-fold growth since 2010, the absence of dedicated transfer stations and MaaS (Mobility as a Service) integration restricts their widespread adoption for commuting, particularly for distances over 9 km. Infrastructure gaps, hygiene concerns, and seamless connection deficiencies discourage regular bicycle use. This study analyzes the feasibility of establishing bicycle–public transport transfer stations in the Seoul Metropolitan Area and proposes a model for their integration with K-MaaS. (2) Study Design/Methodology/Approach: The study combines quantitative analysis (transport statistics, survey of 32 metropolitan residents conducted in February 2025, Chi-Square test, WTP analysis, CO₂ reduction estimation using 208 g/km as the benchmark, and WHO HEAT model application) with qualitative analysis (prior research review, international case studies, simulation scenario design). (3) Findings: Survey results show that 93.8% of respondents would more actively use personal mobility if hygiene, storage, and transfer inconveniences were minimized. Eco-mileage integration could increase personal mobility use intention by approximately 193%. The proposed transfer stations at Digital Media City, Yeouinaru, and Sports Complex stations are estimated to yield monthly CO₂ reductions of approximately 18,720 tons. A public–private partnership (PPP) operation model with monthly subscription fees of KRW 30,000–50,000 is identified as the most economically viable approach. (4) Originality/Value: This study establishes a new concept of bicycle transfer stations as multi-functional smart mobility hubs integrating MaaS, contributing to carbon reduction, public health improvement, and sustainable urban transport system construction.

References
  1. Gu, D., Han, A., & Kim, H. (2023). Analysis of changes in commuting behavior in the post-COVID era. [Journal not specified]
  2. Im, Y., Baek, N., Lee, J., & Park, J. (2008). Research on bicycle use activation measures: Focusing on development of performance indicators for bicycle use activation policy. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 2008.11.30. KRIHS 2008-21.
  3. Jang, J., Kim, T., & Lee, M. (2016). A study on the characteristics of public bicycle use in Seoul—Case of Yeouido and Sangam districts. Seoul Urban Research, 17(4), 77–91.
  4. Kim, B., Kim, Y., Oh, S., & Je, S. (2010). Analysis of health promotion effect of bicycle use. Kyung Hee University.
  5. Kim, G., Lee, G., & Choi, G. (2010). Analysis of the relationship between spatial and social factors in the metropolitan area and bicycle travel. Korean Society of Civil Engineers Academic Conference.
  6. Kim, T. et al., Korea Transport Institute. (2023). K-MaaS promotion strategy and activation measures.
  7. Kim, Y., Lee, K., & Ahn, G. (2008). Analysis of regional factors affecting bicycle commuting rates—Targeting 25 autonomous districts in Seoul. Urban Design, 9(1), 19–34.
  8. Lee, P., & Oh, S. (2011). Methods for installing bicycle storage facilities in stations.
  9. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. Bicycle usage status (2023). https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=110&tblId=DT_110031_003&conn_path=I3
  10. Seoul Institute. (2024). Seoul Infographics No. 352.
  11. Seoul Research Institute. (2012). https://data.si.re.kr/data/
  12. Statistical Office Press Release (2024.12.20). 2024 Commuter worker movement characteristics experimental statistics.
  13. Anderson et al. (2019). Analysis of the willingness to pay for bike commuter facilities: A case study of Portland, Oregon.
  14. Butler, B. et al. (2021). [Bicycle parking distance and usage rate study – cited in text].
  15. Coppola, D. et al. (2025). [Willingness to use bicycle transfer stations with shower and charging facilities].
  16. Donald, B., & Brail, S. (2024). Urban Mobility: How the iPhone, COVID, and Climate Changed Everything. University of Toronto Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/123695
  17. Georgakis, P., Almohammad, A., & Bothos, E. (2019). Multi-Modal route planning in mobility as a service. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference.
  18. Glenn, L., Scott, C., & Karla, J. (2021). Combo travel: Active and motorised modes working better together. Innovate UK, UWE Bristol.
  19. Kim, S., Choo, S., Choi, S., & Lee, H. (2021). What factors affect commuters’ utility of choosing Mobility as a Service? An empirical evidence from Seoul. Sustainability, 13(16), 9324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169324
  20. Ku, D. G., Um, J. S., Byonk, Y. J., & Lee, S. J. (2021). Changes in passengers’ travel behavior due to COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(14), 7974.
  21. Le Pira, M. et al. (2021). [Transfer stage willingness reduction study – cited in text].
  22. Narayanan, S. et al. (2023). [Effect of free public bicycles on personal bicycle usage – cited in text].
  23. Qiao, S. et al. (2022). [Effect of electric kick-scooters and shared bicycles on personal bicycle parking usage – cited in text].
  24. van Steen, J., Delft University of Technology (TU Delft). (2024). Modal Shift Strategies from Car to Public Transport via Shared Bicycle Integration: A case study on suburban commuting in South Holland.
  25. Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, S., & Kou, G. (2024). Availability simulation and transfer prediction for bike sharing systems based on discrete event simulation. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 94.
  26. Websites
  27. Green Post Korea (2020.05.31). https://www.greenpostkorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=117733
  28. Gwanak FM (2018.02.13). http://www.radiogfm.net/news/13733
  29. KBS News (2023.09.15). https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/pc/view/view.do?ncd=7775070
  30. KBS News (2023.10.31). https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/pc/view/view.do?ncd=7806324
  31. Korea Transport Institute (2017.03.09). National bicycle usage status. https://www.koti.re.kr/user/bbs/pmediaView.do?bbs_no=56291
  32. Researcher’s Survey (2025.02). https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1fbXkjaVvQGk4AUtcQKGo44BapCh2MFCbzsjEzRPzPe8/edit
  33. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2018.02.12). https://mediahub.seoul.go.kr/archives/1139857
  34. Seoul Open Data Plaza. https://data.seoul.go.kr/dataList/10281/S/2/datasetView.do
Keywords
bicycle transfer station MaaS sustainable transport public transport integration carbon reduction public health K-MaaS PPP model personal mobility metropolitan commuting
Details

Authors
SungJin Park Primary Contact
Mitel Korea
How to Cite
A Study on Building a Sustainable Transportation System through the Introduction of Bicycle–Public Transport Transfer Stations. (2026). ASSIST Business Review, 2(6). https://jnl.ampla.page/abr/article/view/103