Skip to content

A Comparative Case Study on the Environmental Performance of Circular Economy in Rental and Subscription Businesses: A Double Materiality Perspective on SK Magic and Coway

Chae-seok Choi Primary Contact , Jae-eun Kim Corresponding Author
Abstract

This research provides a comprehensive analysis of the transition from a linear "take-make-waste" economy to a circular model within the South Korean home appliance rental and subscription industry, specifically focusing on SK Magic and Coway. By applying the framework of Double Materiality, this study investigates how Product-Service Systems (PSS) facilitate resource circulation and create both environmental and financial value. The analysis is structured around four critical performance variables: product and resource re-covery rates, post-consumer recycled (PCR) and refurbished material ratios, carbon emission intensity (Scope 3), and the lifespan extension index. The findings reveal that SK Magic has established strategic leadership through its commitment to a 2040 Net-Zero target—validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)—and aggressive material innovation in its "Green Collection," which utilizes up to 99.5% PCR plastic. Its internalization of the Hwaseong Recycling Center enables a robust closed-loop system for high-value material recovery. Conversely, Coway demonstrates superior operational maturity and scale, achieving a 100% waste recycling rate at its business sites and implementing a large-scale specialized recovery system for mattresses. A critical contribution of this study is the iden-tification of the "Circular Economy Rebound Effect" within the PSS model. While rental models structurally encourage product longevity, the greenhouse gas emissions associated with frequent "Care Services" and extensive reverse logistics can offset environmental gains if not managed through digital transformation, such as IoT-based remote diagnostics. The research concludes that extending product lifetimes from 3 to 5 years is the most potent strategy for dual-value creation, slowing material metabolism (Impact Materiality) while optimizing depreciation and maximizing Customer Lifetime Value (Financial Materiality). To meet emerging global disclosure standards like ESRS E5, the industry must move toward standardized metrics for resource inflows, outflows, and the quantification of financial effects arising from circularity risks and opportunities.

References
  1. Bocken, N. M. P., et al. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56
  2. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy Vol. 1: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org
  3. Manzini, E., & Vezzoli, C. (2003). A strategic design approach to develop sustainable product service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(8), 851-857
  4. Gaiardelli, P., Resta, B., Martinez, V., Pinto, R., & Albores, P. (2014). "A classification model for product-service offerings." Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 507-519
  5. Vezzoli, C., & Manzini, E. (2008). Design for environmental sustainability. Springer Science Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-163-3
  6. Sakao, T., Bocken, N., Nasr, N., & Umeda, Y. (2024). Implementing circular economy activities in manufacturing for environmental sustainability. CIRP Annals, 73(2), 457-481
  7. Jin, I. (2016). Circular Economy Policy in Korea. In V. Anbumozhi & J. Kim (Eds.), Towards a Circular Economy: Corporate Management and Policy Pathways, 172-197
  8. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy — A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.
  9. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2023). GRI 301: Materials. https://www.globalreporting.org
  10. European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) (2023) E5: Resource use and circular economy
  11. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2023). TCFD Recommendations Status Report. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org
  12. Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 246-260
  13. Salwin, M., Kraslawski, A., Lipiak, J., Gołębiewski, D., & Andrzejewski, M. (2020). Product-Service System business model for printing houses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122939
  14. Kim, J. H. (2024). Effect of transition to resource circulation economy for responding climate change on Scope 3 emissions. Journal of Environmental Studies, 45(2), 120-145
  15. Miura, Y. (2021). Carbon footprint reduction potential of clothing rental subscription with consideration of direct economic rebound effect (Master's thesis). Radboud University and University of Bergen, Nijmegen/Bergen. https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/items/5ed15e90-f374-4032-80e3-e8ca2cb97080
  16. Amasawa, E., Kimita, K., Yoshida, T., & Hirao, M. (2025). Exploring different product-service combinations for sustainable clothing rental service based on consumer preferences and climate change impacts. Scientific Reports, 15, 87893
  17. Kjær, L. L., Pigosso, D. C. A., McAloone, T. C., & Birkved, M. (2018). Guidelines for evaluating the environmental performance of Product/Service-Systems through life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 666–678
  18. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
  19. Samsung Electronics. (2024). 2024 Sustainability Report. Samsung Electronics. https://www.samsung.com/sec/sustainability/
  20. Kia. (2025). Kia Sustainability Report 2025. Kia. https://worldwide.kia.com/kr/sustainability
  21. Coway. (2024). 2024 Coway Sustainability Report. Coway. https://sustainability.coway.co.kr
  22. SK Networks. (2023). 2024 Sustainability Report. SK Networks. https://www.sknetworks.co.kr
Keywords
Circular Economy Product-Service Systems (PSS) Double Materiality Rental and Subscription Industry Scope 3 Emissions Lifetime Extension Circular Economy Re-bound Effect ESRS E5.
Details

Authors
Chae-seok Choi Primary Contact
Seoul School of Integrated Science and Technologies
Jae-eun Kim Corresponding Author
Seoul School of Integrated Science and Technologies
How to Cite
A Comparative Case Study on the Environmental Performance of Circular Economy in Rental and Subscription Businesses: A Double Materiality Perspective on SK Magic and Coway. (2026). Journal of Sustainability Management, 11(1). https://jnl.ampla.page/jsm/article/view/135